Header Ads

Header ADS

Domino theory and its applications in Africa during the last decade

 


 

"You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly.”

Former US President Dwight Eisenhower

 

This statement by Eisenhower represents an abbreviation for what is called the “domino theory.” In April 1954, the American President repeated this statement during a press conference, expressing the theory without naming it, as he believed that communist control of Vietnam would lead to similar communist victories in neighboring countries in Southeast Asia, such as Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, India, Japan, the Philippines, and Indonesia, all the way to Australia and New Zealand. US foreign policy makers had already adopted this idea, so the National Security Council included the domino theory in its report on Indochina in 1952.

 

The Origins of the Domino Theory and its Assumptions:

The direct background that influenced the emergence of this theory was due to two basic factors: the first; The fate of the victory of the revolutionary forces led by Mao Zedong in the Chinese Civil War, and the fear of some American politicians in 1947 that the fall of China into the hands of Stalin would be the beginning of the fall of all of Asia.

The second; The outbreak of the Cold War between the Western camp led by the United States and the Eastern camp led by the Soviet Union, in light of the difficulty of resolving differences between the two camps by force of arms and the strong opposition to a new world war, and the awareness of the nature of the mutual destruction that the war would generate after the Soviet Union developed nuclear weapons in 1949 AD.

 

This theory assumes the existence of an external force capable of destabilizing the existing state of stability between neighboring groups of entities organized in a certain order, and it assumes that once that force succeeds in destabilizing any of those entities; A wave of instability begins to affect every element of the system, one after another. This wave has a speed of propagation that is affected by the extent to which the elements that fall first have an intrinsic ability to enhance the spread of the wave’s effect.

 

One of the conditions for this theory to be true is that the distance between the entities that make up the system be equal, that they fall at a certain speed, and that those entities must be willing to be affected by the wave. This theory emphasizes the importance of the external factor to bring about a change in a country. This theory has been used in the field of comparative political systems, and the studies that have used it have concluded that; the rise and fall in the degree of democracy in a particular country spread and infect the neighboring countries. Thus, change within a given country brings about a similar change in neighboring countries, similar to a contagion effect.

 

The United States used the domino theory to justify its intervention in the Vietnam War under John Kennedy in the 1960s to keep South Vietnam from falling into the trap of communism, on the grounds that its fall would lead to other countries falling into communism. After the assassination of John F. Kennedy, US President Lyndon Johnson also used the domino theory to justify strengthening the US military presence in Vietnam from a few thousand to more than half a million soldiers over the next five years.

 

This theory was also the main reason why the United States stood in the face of any democratic change in the Latin American countries that it considered its backyard. It stood in the face of social and political transformations in these countries, and even supported military coups in them in order to stop these countries’ transition to democracy. Perhaps the most famous of these coups occurred in Guatemala in the 1950s, and the same thing happened in the Dominican Republic and other countries in the twentieth century, including, of course, Chile in the 1970s, and Argentina, Nicaragua, and others -in other decades-.

 

African Revolutions Domino:

After the success of revolutions in several African countries, and the fall of a number of tyrannical rulers; The domino theory has returned to the fore; Where the conditions mentioned above were met. A popular revolution took place in Tunisia to overthrow Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, followed by the revolution in Egypt to overthrow Hosni Mubarak, followed by Libya and Burkina Faso, then Algeria, Sudan and Mali, in a literal application of the domino theory.

 

It can be said that the main effect that can be related to the domino theory, with regard to the African situation and the spread of protests in more than one African country, is that the success of the Tunisian revolution, despite the presence of an authoritarian regime, made the Egyptians break the barrier of fear and realize that overthrowing such regimes Repression is possible, but it only requires a strong will, a long breath, and collective solidarity, which is what happened in Egypt. When the transformation succeeded in Egypt, the central Arab and African country, and with the global attention and international reactions it received, it restored hope to other peoples who were suffering from oppression, the scenario of inheriting power, and losing any hope for changing, which is what happened later in other countries.

 

The British historian and thinker Eric Hobsbawm pointed out this meaning in the 1990s. He defined the revolution as a major transformation in the structure of society, and pointed to four elements that must be considered when talking about the revolution, the first of which is; Privacy: Every revolution has its own specificity in terms of time and place. Secondly; Victory: means the victory of a new system over the old system. And third: Cumulative: The explosion of the revolution is due to factors accumulated over the years, which created pressure on the base and generated the explosion that is represented in the state of revolution. And fourth: The geographical dimension of the revolution “contagion theory”:

 

The contagion effect means imitation of a successful democratic transformation from one country to another, as this encourages a democratic transformation in another country in the same way. Countries, like humans, usually seek to imitate other successful people, and imitation is very similar to a snowball that increases in size as it rolls.

 

Perhaps one of the factors that contribute to greater transmission of infection is: This tremendous development in communications systems and audio-visual radio networks and the ease of receiving them all over the world, despite some governments trying to block the arrival of such news to their people, it was transmitted in more than one way to the people, which provided an opportunity for global public opinion to influence the form and crystallization of public opinion. In addition to this, other factors play a role in achieving the contagion effect, such as cultural similarity and geographical borders. The revolutionary tide of the Arab and African countries was a real and actual embodiment and application of the extent of the impact and effectiveness of the contagion of democratic transformation as an important factor of transformation.

 

On the African continent; Soon after one domino game ends, another begins. While the countries of the African continent witnessed a decline in the rate of coups in the 1980s and early 1990s, the rates of civil wars increased, reaching their peak during the mid-1990s, when the number of wars and civil conflicts on the continent reached about 15 wars. With the beginning of the new millennium and the twenty-first century, the intensity of civil wars subsided, but the phenomenon of military coups soon re-emerged, especially as a shift in the course of popular revolutions.

 

African Coups Domino:

Egypt paved the way for coups like she did for revolutions. This happened after the military coup in Egypt in 2013, which was followed by a coup in Burkina Faso in 2014. In less than two years, Africa witnessed five successful military coups, two in Mali, one in Guinea, one in Sudan, and one in Burkina Faso.

 

In Tunisia, elected President Kais Saied turned against the government and parliament. He monopolized most of the powers in a move described as a soft coup. In addition, there is a failed coup attempt in Niger, and an arbitrary transfer of power in Chad following the assassination of its president, Idriss Deby. This is all in addition to a number of failed coup attempts, the most recent of which was carried out by soldiers in Guinea-Bissau against the rule of President Amaru Sissoko Embalo.

 

There are many reasons and pretexts used by the military to justify their coups, but it has been noted that the military in the third millennium provide the same reasons and justifications that the generation that preceded them gave in the seventies of the twentieth century, which is the trinity of corruption, poverty, and mismanagement at home, and the conflict of interests of the major powers abroad, in a new phase that is more like a cold war in the way it manages the hidden conflicts between the traditional Western powers and the new Eastern powers as competitors.

 

If we look at how Western powers, led by the United States of America, deal with coups in Africa, we will find that they condemn them, but in the end, they accept them as a method for transitioning power in Africa, and so does France, which is a blatant contradiction between the philosophy of promoting democracy and accepting coup governments and dealing with them.

 

The External Factor and the Domino Theory in Africa:

The last decade witnessed the rise of Russian influence on the continent at the expense of French decline, with Turkish attempts to penetrate the African Horn and Sahel regions, as well as American attempts to regain control in Africa. Geopolitical considerations have become dominant in the dealings of major powers with Africa, and the increasing international scramble to exploit African resources has led to the outbreak of proxy conflicts and then escalation of tensions that spread to neighboring countries in a manner similar to domino movements.

 

This was accompanied by two main trends: the first; It is represented by the expansion of transnational terrorist networks in the Sahel and East Africa in a broad sense, which is based on the presence of an abundance of roaming foreign fighters. Secondly; It is represented by the proliferation of foreign military bases amid increasing Sino-American geopolitical tensions. Thus, the external factor plays a major role in multiplying the domino effect and spreading tensions in the countries of the continent, which ultimately opens a loophole for external powers to penetrate into Africa and achieve their interests there.

 

Conclusion; During the last decade, the African continent has witnessed dramatic transformations that have upended all expectations and aborted the struggle of the African peoples to achieve liberation, development and construction. When the African Spring revolutions domino converted to African coups domino that herald the fall of the continent, a return to the square of exhaustion and endless conflicts. With African countries topping the Fragile States Index for the year 2021, The possibility of coups occurring in Africa increases, which will deprive the continent of many opportunities that could have contributed to its economic and development renaissance, and will exacerbate the already deteriorating situation. By reading the debates of international powers on the African stage, it can be said that these powers may contribute to exacerbating the chaos if necessary in order to achieve their interests.


By: Dr. Doaa Ewida

Sobol Magazine

The main article:

No comments

Powered by Blogger.